Made byBobr AI

Integrated Stormwater Treatment Business Case & MCA

A multi-criteria assessment (MCA) of stormwater treatment options, focusing on compliance, risk mitigation, and whole-of-life cost analysis.

#stormwater-management#business-case#environmental-compliance#risk-assessment#infrastructure-planning#water-quality
Watch
Pitch

MCA Results

Multi-Criteria Assessment — Why Option 3 Wins

Key Insight

Option 3 is the ONLY option addressing BOTH water quantity AND water quality — and it achieved the highest score across all three assessment categories.

Summary Score Table

Option Name MCA Score
Option 1 Do Nothing 2.2
Option 2 Min. Compliance – Quantity Only 3.0
Option 3 ← RECOMMENDED
Integrated Treatment – Qty + Quality 4.6
Option 4 Advanced Treatment with Reuse 3.8

Visual Score Comparison

Option 1
2.2
Option 2
3.0
Option 3
4.6
Option 4
3.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
Made byBobr AI

Risk Summary

Residual Risk After Mitigation

KEY INSIGHT

Option 3 is the ONLY option with NO residual risks above MEDIUM after mitigation. No other option achieves this profile.

Residual Risk Comparison — Post-Mitigation

Option Regulatory Environmental Financial Operational
Option 1 HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH
Option 2 MEDIUM HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM
Option 3 ← RECOMMENDED
LOW LOW MEDIUM LOW
Option 4 LOW LOW HIGH MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
Made byBobr AI

Financial Summary

Discounted Total Cost Analysis

Key Insight

Stormwater infrastructure generates no direct revenue — value is captured through avoided fines ($277,888/yr), regulatory compliance, and operational enablement.

Option 1 (Do Nothing) incurs $277,888/yr in penalties — inaction is the most expensive choice.

Discounted Whole-of-Life Cost Comparison

Option Name Direct Cost
Option 1 Do Nothing $0 capital
but $277,888/yr fines ongoing
Option 2 Min. Compliance – Qty Only $892,340
Option 3 LOWEST COST
Integrated Treatment $771,485
Option 4 Advanced Treatment + Reuse $1,204,670

Value Justification

Avoided Fines

$277,888/yr avoided under Option 3

Regulatory Compliance

Licence conditions met; enforcement risk eliminated

Operational Enablement

STP Stage 6 expansion can proceed without stormwater constraint

Made byBobr AI

Recommended: Option 3

Integrated Treatment — Water Quantity + Quality

Only Full Compliance Solution

Option 3 is the ONLY option that resolves BOTH water quantity AND water quality non-compliance. Partial solutions leave regulatory risk unresolved.

Lowest Whole-of-Life Cost

At $771,485 discounted total, Option 3 is the most cost-effective compliant solution. Do Nothing costs more through $277,888/yr in ongoing fines.

Best Risk Profile

No residual risks above Medium after mitigation. No other option achieves this. Option 3 eliminates enforcement, environmental and operational risk.

Full Strategic Alignment

Aligns with both the Solid Waste Strategy 2024 and Towards Zero Waste Plan 2025–2028. Option 3 is not just compliant — it's the strategically right investment.

Option 3 delivers compliance, lowest cost, best risk, and strategic fit — the decision is clear.

Made byBobr AI

Implementation Plan

18-Month Delivery Programme

  • Open market tender model
  • Two-stage funding release
  • Critical path: EA amendment drives design timeline
  • Co-delivered with STP Stage 6 works
Month 0
Month 7
Month 10
Month 18
1

Funding Approval & Initiation

Business case approved. Project charter established. Funding released — Stage 1. Stakeholder notification and project team mobilised.

2

Design & EA Amendment

Detailed design completed. Environmental Authority amendment lodged and approved. Procurement documentation prepared.

3

Procurement & Tender

Open market tender released. Contractor evaluation and selection. Second-stage funding released. Contract awarded.

4

Construction & Commissioning

Construction of integrated stormwater treatment system. Testing and commissioning. Handover and compliance verification. Regulatory sign-off.

Critical path: EA amendment (Months 1–7) determines overall programme — delays here directly impact construction start.

Made byBobr AI
Bobr AI

DESIGNER-MADE
PRESENTATION,
GENERATED FROM
YOUR PROMPT

Create your own professional slide deck with real images, data charts, and unique design in under a minute.

Generate For Free

Integrated Stormwater Treatment Business Case & MCA

A multi-criteria assessment (MCA) of stormwater treatment options, focusing on compliance, risk mitigation, and whole-of-life cost analysis.

MCA Results

Multi-Criteria Assessment — Why Option 3 Wins

Option 3 is the ONLY option addressing BOTH water quantity AND water quality — and it achieved the highest score across all three assessment categories.

Risk Summary

Residual Risk After Mitigation

Option 3 is the ONLY option with NO residual risks above MEDIUM after mitigation. No other option achieves this profile.

Residual Risk Comparison — Post-Mitigation

Financial Summary

Discounted Total Cost Analysis

Stormwater infrastructure generates no direct revenue — value is captured through avoided fines ($277,888/yr), regulatory compliance, and operational enablement.

Option 1 (Do Nothing) incurs $277,888/yr in penalties — inaction is the most expensive choice.

Discounted Whole-of-Life Cost Comparison

Do Nothing

Min. Compliance – Qty Only

Integrated Treatment

Advanced Treatment + Reuse

Value Justification

Avoided Fines

$277,888/yr avoided under Option 3

Regulatory Compliance

Licence conditions met; enforcement risk eliminated

Operational Enablement

STP Stage 6 expansion can proceed without stormwater constraint

Recommended: Option 3

Integrated Treatment — Water Quantity + Quality

Only Full Compliance Solution

Option 3 is the ONLY option that resolves BOTH water quantity AND water quality non-compliance. Partial solutions leave regulatory risk unresolved.

Lowest Whole-of-Life Cost

At $771,485 discounted total, Option 3 is the most cost-effective compliant solution. Do Nothing costs more through $277,888/yr in ongoing fines.

Best Risk Profile

No residual risks above Medium after mitigation. No other option achieves this. Option 3 eliminates enforcement, environmental and operational risk.

Full Strategic Alignment

Aligns with both the Solid Waste Strategy 2024 and Towards Zero Waste Plan 2025–2028. Option 3 is not just compliant — it's the strategically right investment.

Option 3 delivers compliance, lowest cost, best risk, and strategic fit — the decision is clear.

Implementation Plan

18-Month Delivery Programme

Open market tender model

Two-stage funding release

Critical path: EA amendment drives design timeline

Co-delivered with STP Stage 6 works

Funding Approval & Initiation

Business case approved. Project charter established. Funding released — Stage 1. Stakeholder notification and project team mobilised.

Design & EA Amendment

Detailed design completed. Environmental Authority amendment lodged and approved. Procurement documentation prepared.

Procurement & Tender

Open market tender released. Contractor evaluation and selection. Second-stage funding released. Contract awarded.

Construction & Commissioning

Construction of integrated stormwater treatment system. Testing and commissioning. Handover and compliance verification. Regulatory sign-off.

Critical path: EA amendment (Months 1–7) determines overall programme — delays here directly impact construction start.

  • stormwater-management
  • business-case
  • environmental-compliance
  • risk-assessment
  • infrastructure-planning
  • water-quality