MSRA Revision: Disclosing Serious Communicable Diseases
Expert MSRA UK exam notes on GMC guidance for disclosing communicable diseases, patient consent, public interest, and healthcare worker risks.
MSRA Revision: Disclosing Info on Serious Communicable Diseases
Key notes based on General Medical Council (GMC) Guidance
Core Principles: When to Disclose
1. CONSENT: Always the starting point. Ask unless unsafe or impracticable.
2. LAW: Must disclose if required by statute (e.g., notifiable diseases) or court order. (Judge/Presiding Officer).
3. PUBLIC INTEREST: Justified if consent refused BUT failure to disclose exposes others to risk of death or serious harm.
Public Interest Disclosures: Step-by-Step
Threshold: Risk is so serious it outweighs patient/public interest in confidentiality.
Procedure: Inform patient BEFORE disclosing (if safe/practicable), even if you intend to disclose without consent.
Key Exception: Do not inform patient if it undermines purpose (e.g., serious crime detection) or puts others at risk.
Risks Posed by Health Care Workers (HCWs)
Self-Assessment: You MUST NOT rely on your own assessment of risk to patients.
Action: Consult a suitably qualified colleague. Follow their advice regarding practice changes.
Colleagues: If raising concerns about a colleague with a serious communicable disease, inform them first (if safe/practicable).
Sharing Info Within the Direct Care Team
Most patients understand sharing is needed. If a patient objects:
1. Explain potential consequences to their care.
2. Seek compromise.
3. If refusal puts HCWs at risk: Disclosure WITHOUT consent is unlikely justified if Universal Precautions manage the risk.
Note: HCWs are entitled to protection, but if universal precautions (standard infection control) work, privacy prevails.
Needlestick Injuries & Prophylaxis
Immediate: Urgently assess risk (qualified colleague).
Consent: Ask source patient for consent to disclose infection status.
Refusal/Inability: If patient refuses or cannot consent (unconscious) → Disclose if justified in public interest.
Public Interest Justification: Information is needed for decisions about continuing Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP).
Informing Sexual & Close Contacts
You may disclose to increasing risk contacts IF:
A) The person is at risk of infection likely to result in SERIOUS HARM.
B) The patient has not informed them and cannot be persuaded to do so.
Process: Tell patient before disclosing (if safe). When notifying the contact, DO NOT disclose the identity of the source patient if practicable.
Children & Safeguarding
Testing children (including vertical transmission risks). Most parents will act to protect children.
SAFEGUARDING TRIGGER:
If parents refuse to allow child to be tested/treated, AND the child is at risk of serious harm...
ACTION: Treat as a safeguarding concern. Follow specific child protection guidance.
Death Certificates
MANDATORY REQUIREMENT
If a serious communicable disease has contributed to the cause of death, you MUST record this on the patient's death certificate.
One-Page Cheat Sheet: MSRA Decision Logic
CONSENT: Always first. Ask unless unsafe.
CONTACT TRACING: Disclose if risk of serious harm + patient refusal. Keep patient anonymous.
HCW RISK: Consult colleague. Don't self-assess. Univ. Precautions usually prevent need to disclose.
NEEDLESTICK: Assess risk. If unconscious/refusal, disclose for PEP decisions.
LAW: Statute/Judge orders override consent.
- msra
- gmc-guidance
- medical-ethics
- communicable-diseases
- professional-dilemmas
- uk-medical-exams
- sjv-revision






