Made byBobr AI

BRD4 Regulation of p53 in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Study

PhD thesis analysis on BRD4-mediated post-translational regulation of p53 in breast cancer cells and rMATS pipeline for alternative splicing analysis.

#breast-cancer-research#p53-protein#brd4-inhibitor#mcf-7-cells#oncology#epigenetics#molecular-biology#biomedical-science
Watch
Pitch
p53
BRD4
[University Logo]
[Institute Logo]
PhD THESIS DEFENSE 2024
Role of BRD4 in Regulation of p53 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells (MCF-7)
Establishing rMATS Pipeline for Alternative Splicing Analysis
CANDIDATE
[Student Name]
[Enrollment No.]
GUIDED BY
[Dr. Guide Name]
[Department of Biochemistry / Biotechnology]
[Institute Name]
[University Name]
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
Presentation Overview
Thesis Defense | BRD4 & p53 in Breast Cancer
01
πŸ”¬
Introduction
Breast Cancer Overview, Epidemiology
02
🧬
Molecular Biology
BRD4, p53, BET Family
03
πŸ”
Epigenetics
Histone Modifications, Super-Enhancers
04
πŸ’Š
MZ1 PROTAC
Mechanism & Selectivity
05
πŸ₯
MCF-7 Model
Cell Line & DNA Damage
06
βš—οΈ
Methodology
Western Blot, RT-PCR, rMATS
07
πŸ“Š
Results
BCA, Western Blot, qPCR Data
08
πŸ’¬
Discussion
Findings & Significance
09
🎯
Conclusion
Future Scope & References
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
2.3 Million
New cases annually (GLOBOCAN 2021)
685,000
Deaths per year worldwide
Most common
Cancer in women globally
CANCER
LANDSCAPE
01
TP53 Mutation
50% of all cancers
02
BRD4 Upregulation
Epigenetic driver
03
TNBC Subtype
Most aggressive, no receptor targets
04
Cell Cycle Dysregulation
CDK pathway disruption
"
The interplay between BRD4 and p53 represents a critical therapeutic axis in breast cancer progression.
[University Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID]
Made byBobr AI
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Global & Indian Burden of Breast Cancer
Global Breast Cancer Burden
2.3M
New Cases / Year
685K
Deaths / Year
27%
Of all female cancers
diagnosed globally are
Breast Cancer
Source: GLOBOCAN 2022
Incidence Trend (2000-2022)
The Indian Scenario
192,020
New Cases (2022)
98,337
Deaths (2022)
Key Demographic Shift
Younger median age at diagnosis in India compared to Western populations, indicating earlier onset and aggressive phenotypes.
Median Age: India 40-50 years
YOUNGER
Median Age: Western 45-55 years
Molecular Subtypes & Clinical Prognosis
Luminal A
ER+ / PR+ / HER2- 40-50%
β€’ Low proliferation (Ki-67)
β€’ Best overall prognosis
β€’ TP53 mutation: ~12%
Endocrine Therapy
Luminal B
ER+ / PRΒ± / HER2Β± 10-20%
β€’ High proliferation
β€’ Intermediate prognosis
β€’ TP53 mutation: ~32%
Endocrine + Chemo
HER2-enriched
ER- / PR- / HER2+ 10-15%
β€’ HER2 amplification
β€’ Aggressive, node positive
β€’ TP53 mutation: ~75%
Targeted (Trastuzumab)
TNBC / Basal-like
ER- / PR- / HER2- 15-20%
β€’ BRCA1 correlation
β€’ Worst overall prognosis
β€’ TP53 mutation: >80%
Chemotherapy
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
Molecular Classification
Four Subtypes β€” Distinct Biology, Distinct Outcomes
Pathway Upregulation
LUMINAL A
~40%
BIOMARKERS
ER
POSITIVE
PR
POSITIVE
HER2
NEGATIVE
Low Ki-67
TP53 Mut: <15%
Endocrine therapy responsive
BEST PROGNOSIS
LUMINAL B
~20%
BIOMARKERS
ER
POSITIVE
Ki-67
HIGH
TP53 Mut: 25%
Endocrine + Chemo
MODERATE PROGNOSIS
HER2-ENRICHED
~15%
BIOMARKERS
ER
NEGATIVE
PR
NEGATIVE
HER2
POSITIVE
TP53 Mut: 40%
Trastuzumab
MODERATE PROGNOSIS
TNBC / BASAL-LIKE
~15-20%
BIOMARKERS
ER
NEGATIVE
PR
NEGATIVE
HER2
NEGATIVE
!
TP53 Mut: >82%
Chemo only (PARP/PD1)
⚠ BRD4 Overexpressed
4.6Γ—
POOR PROGNOSIS
Department of Oncology | Graduate Research Defense
Made byBobr AI
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
BRD4 & the BET Protein Family
BRD4-L (Long Isoform) BD1 BD2 ET CTD BRD4-S (Short Isoform) BD1 BD2 ET Reads: H3K27ac, H3K14ac, H4K...ac
BET Protein Family Members
BRD2
Domains: BD1 + BD2
Function: Transcription / Cell cycle
Tissue: Ubiquitous
BRD3
Domains: BD1 + BD2
Function: Erythropoiesis
Tissue: Ubiquitous
BRD4 ONCOGENIC
Domains: BD1 + BD2 + ET + CTD
Function: Super-enhancer / P-TEFb / HAT
Tissue: Ubiquitous
OVEREXPRESSED IN CANCER
BRDT
Domains: BD1 + BD2
Function: Spermatogenesis
Tissue: Testis-specific
BRD4 Dual Function Pathway
Transcription regulation and oncogene activation mechanics
BRD4
Central Hub
Reads H3K27ac
β†’ Super-enhancer binding
Recruits P-TEFb
β†’ RNA Pol II phosphorylation
β†’ Transcription elongation
HAT activity at H3K122
β†’ Nucleosome eviction
Drives MYC, BCL2, CCND1, TP53
transcription
Overexpressed in cancer
β†’ poor prognosis
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
12
Made byBobr AI
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR
p53: The Guardian of the Genome
TP53 β€” Most Frequently Mutated Gene in Human Cancer
Key Mutation Statistics
TP53 mutated in ~50% of all cancers
>80% of TNBC | <15% of Luminal A

Protein Architecture

p53 domains (393 Amino Acids)

TAD
PRD
DBD
OD
CTD
Transactivation Domain
β€’ Facilitates MDM2 binding
β€’ Recruits transcription machinery
⚠️ DNA Binding Domain
Most mutations here!
Directly contacts the consensus p53-response element (p53RE) sequence on target promoters.
Oligomerization Domain
Tetramer formation. Necessary for successful DNA binding.
NORMAL STATE
Unstressed Cell
p53
+
MDM2
βž”
Ubiquitination &
Rapid Degradation
via 26S Proteasome
Protein Turnover Profile
Levels:
STRESS STATE
Activation
DNA Damage / Oncogenes / Hypoxia
ATM / ATR phosphorylate Ser15/Ser20
Conformational change disrupts MDM2 binding
p53 Stabilized & Accumulates
Active Tetramer Binds p53RE
Target Gene Activation
p21
CDKN1A
βž”
G1/S Cell Cycle Arrest
Halts cell division, allowing time for DNA repair mechanisms to fix damage.
BAX
PUMA, NOXA
βž”
Apoptosis
Induces programmed cell death via mitochondrial permeabilization if damage is severe.
GADD45
DDB2, XPC
βž”
DNA Repair
Directly coordinates Global Genomic Nucleotide Excision Repair (GG-NER).
PML
PAI-1
βž”
Senescence
Triggers irreversible cell cycle exit, preventing proliferation of damaged cells permanently.
University Name | Institute Name | Department of Molecular Biology
Made byBobr AI
MOLECULAR AXIS
BRD4–p53 Regulatory Interaction
How BRD4 Controls the Tumor Suppressor
[Institute Logo]
BRD4 Protein
BRD4 occupancy required for baseline TP53 transcription (Zhou et al., 2022)
Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
H3K27ac-enriched Super-Enhancer
at TP53 locus
p53 Tetramer
BRD4 Active
BRD4 reads H3K27ac at TP53 super-enhancer
Recruits transcriptional machinery
p53 mRNA transcribed
p53 protein expressed
Tumor suppression active
BRD4 Inhibited (JQ1)
BRD4 displaced from super-enhancer
Partial reduction in TP53 transcription
Some p53 protein reduction
BRD4 Degraded (MZ1)
Complete BRD4 elimination
Super-enhancer collapse
Post-translational p53 accumulation
Complex regulatory outcome
Nagarajan et al. (2022)
BRD4 regulates wild-type p53 at super-enhancers in luminal breast cancer
Zhou et al. (2022)
BRD4 required for baseline TP53 transcription in MCF-7 cells
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE
Radiation & DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
2 Gy Ionizing Radiation
DNA Double-Strand Break (DSB)
MRN Complex (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) detects DSB
ATM Kinase Recruited & Activated
DNA Repair Pathway
Ξ³H2AX foci formation at DSBs
Homologous Recombination (HR) via RAD51
BRD4 Focus: BRD4 phosphorylated at Ser1117 by IKKΞ± β†’ coordinates DDR
p53 Pathway
p53 phosphorylated at Ser15/Ser20
MDM2 interaction disrupted
p53 stabilized & accumulated
p21/CDK arrest β†’ G1/S checkpoint
BAX/PUMA β†’ Apoptosis
OBSERVATION 1
MCF-7 Response: G2/M arrest (not apoptosis) β€” Radioresistant apoptotic phenotype
TARGETED DEGRADATION
BRD4 degradation by MZ1 β†’ ↓DNMT1 + ↓RAD51 β†’ Radiosensitization (Foran et al., 2025)
KEY FINDING
BRD4 needed for baseline p53 levels β†’ determines radiation response
Molecular Pathways in Radiation Pathology | Breast Cancer Research
Made byBobr AI
EPIGENETICS
Histone Modification: Writers, Erasers & Readers
The Epigenetic Code in Breast Cancer

The Histone Code

Chromatin structure is regulated by distinct covalent modifications on histone tails.

Ac marks (acetylation)
Me marks (methylation)
Ph marks (phosphorylation)
Ub marks (ubiquitination)

WRITERS

Deposit activating/repressive marks

HATs
CBP/p300, GCN5, PCAF
HMTs
EZH2, MLL, G9a
Key Marks
H3K27ac β˜…, H3K4me3

ERASERS

Remove histone marks

HDACs
HDAC1/2, SIRT1
HDMs
LSD1/KDM1A
Note
HDAC1 reduced by BRD4-RAC1 inhibition
Target Focus

READERS

Recognize & bind marked histones

BRD4 (BET proteins)
Reads H3K27ac marks
Chromodomains : Read methylation
PHD fingers : Read methylation marks
β˜… BRD4 is the key oncogenic reader → THERAPEUTIC TARGET
H3K27ac
BRD4 docking, active super-enhancers
H3K27me3
Repressive, antagonizes BRD4
H3K9ac
Active transcription
H3K9me2/3
DSB repair sites
H4K16ac
Reduced at radiation DSBs
University Name | Epigenetics & Breast Cancer Research | 2024
Made byBobr AI
H3K27ac
MYC / ESR1
Compact Chromatin (Repressed)
Open Chromatin with Super-Enhancer
High density of H3K27ac marks
+ Mediator + BRD4 + RNA Pol II
Target Oncogenes Driven by SE
MYC
BCL2
CCND1
TP53
BET Inhibitors (JQ1, MZ1) β†’ BRD4 removed from super-enhancer β†’ Preferential repression of oncogenes
BRD4 upregulation drives endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ breast cancer via super-enhancer reprogramming of ESR1
UNIV LOGO
INST LOGO
Super-Enhancers & BRD4 Overexpression in Breast Cancer
TCGA Analysis: BRD4 as an Epigenetic Oncogene
BRD4 mRNA Expression Across Breast Cancer Subtypes (TCGA)
Normal Mammary
1.0Γ—
Luminal A
1.8Γ—
Luminal B
2.4Γ—
HER2+
3.1Γ—
TNBC / Basal-like
4.6Γ—
4.6Γ— overexpression uniquely in TNBC
Clinical Impact
High BRD4 = High tumor grade + Lymph node infiltration + Reduced survival
Application
Potential prognostic biomarker for optimal risk stratification
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | Data source: TCGA Breast Cancer (BRCA) Project
Made byBobr AI
[University Logo]
[Institute Logo]
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL
MCF-7: The Luminal A Breast Cancer Model
Wild-type p53
Luminal A Subtype
Receptor Status
ER+
PR+
HER2βˆ’
ESTABLISHED: 1973, Michigan Cancer Foundation
βœ“
MDM2-p53 feedback intact
βœ“
Functional G1/S checkpoint
βœ“
ER super-enhancers active
βœ•
Compared To
MDA-MB-231
R280K mutant p53, TNBC
β†’ NOT suitable for studying wt p53
βœ•
Compared To
MDA-MB-468
R273H mutant p53, TNBC
β†’ NOT suitable for studying wt p53
βœ“
Selected Model
MCF-7
WILD-TYPE p53, Luminal A
β†’ IDEAL MODEL FOR STUDY
MCF-7
Relevance
BRD4-mediated wt p53 regulation study
Radiation response with functional p53
Super-enhancer epigenetics in ER+ cancer
70%
of all breast cancers are ER+/Luminal
clinical relevance of this model
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
[UNIV]
[DEPT]
THERAPEUTIC TOOL
MZ1 β€” A PROTAC Degrader of BRD4
Induced Proximity β†’ Ubiquitination β†’ Proteasomal Degradation
JQ1 warhead
Binds BRD4 BD2 (Kd = 15 nM)
PEG linker
Polyethylene glycol spacer
VH032 ligand
Recruits VHL-CRL2 E3 ligase
1002.6 Da | CAS: 1797406-69-9 | Zengerle et al., 2015
COMPLETE BRD4 ELIMINATION
vs JQ1
(only inhibition)
STEP 1
MZ1 enters cell
STEP 2 β€’ TERNARY COMPLEX
JQ1 binds BRD4 BD2 + VH032 recruits VHL-CRL2 E3 ligase
STEP 3
E3 ligase polyubiquitinates BRD4
U
U
U
STEP 4
26S Proteasome degrades BRD4 completely
STEP 5 β€’ RECYCLING
MZ1 released intact
Feature
JQ1 (Inhibitor)
MZ1 (PROTAC)
Mechanism
Occupancy
Catalytic degradation
BRD4 eliminated
No
Yes (complete)
Selectivity
Pan-BET
BRD4-preferential
Downstream effects
Partial
Complete (all BRD4 functions)
Concentration needed
Β΅M range
100-250 nM
[University Name] | [Department] | 2024
Made byBobr AI
SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE
BRD4
RATIONALE
Phase 01
Research Gap
Phase 02
Study Aim
Phase 03
Objectives

Research Gap

01
BRD4's post-translational regulation of p53 in ER+ breast cancer is poorly understood
02
No study examined BRD4 degradation (vs inhibition) effect on p53 in radiation context
03
rMATS alternative splicing analysis pipeline not established in lab for splicing modulator studies

Study Aim

To investigate the role of BRD4 in regulation of p53 expression in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and to establish rMATS pipeline in lab to study splicing changes upon treatment with splicing modulators.

Objectives

1
Evaluate effect of BRD4 degradation (MZ1) and ionizing radiation (2 Gy) on p53 PROTEIN expression in MCF-7 using Western blotting
2
Study effect of BRD4 degradation on p53 TRANSCRIPT expression using RT-PCR
3
Establish a functional rMATS pipeline for alternative splicing analysis
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
[University Logo]
[Institute Logo]
Experimental Design
MCF-7 Cells | MZ1 PROTAC | Ionizing Radiation
MCF-7 (ER+, Wild-type p53)  |  DMEM + 10% FBS + 1% Pen/Strep  |  37Β°C, 5% CO2  |  70-80% confluency
MZ1 Treatment
β–Έ
100 nM MZ1 (PROTAC BRD4 degrader)
β–Έ
Pre-treatment before radiation
β–Έ
Selective BRD4 degradation
8 Experimental Groups
Ctrl
Control
βˆ’MZ1 / βˆ’IR
MZ1
MZ1 Only
+MZ1 / βˆ’IR
30m
2Gy 30min
βˆ’MZ1 / +IR
30m
MZ1+2Gy 30min
+MZ1 / +IR
2hr
2Gy 2hr
βˆ’MZ1 / +IR
2hr
MZ1+2Gy 2hr
+MZ1 / +IR
4hr
2Gy 4hr
βˆ’MZ1 / +IR
4hr
MZ1+2Gy 4hr
+MZ1 / +IR
Ionizing Radiation
β–Έ
2 Gy dose
β–Έ
Harvested at 3 time points: 30 min, 2 hr, 4 hr
1
Protein Analysis
Nuclear Protein Extraction
β–Ό
BCA Assay
β–Ό
Western Blot (p53 + Ξ±-tubulin)
2
Transcript Analysis
RNA Extraction
β–Ό
cDNA Synthesis
β–Ό
RT-PCR (p53/TBP)
3
Bioinformatics
rMATS Pipeline Setup
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
METHODOLOGY
Nuclear Protein Extraction & BCA Protein Assay
Nuclear Protein Extraction Protocol
1. MCF-7 Cells
Harvest with cell scraper β†’ PBS wash β†’ Centrifuge 1000 rpm / 7 min
2. Cytoplasmic Extraction
Resuspend in ice-cold Lysis Buffer A
Incubate 5 min on ice β†’ Spin 13,000 rpm / 3s
Lysis Buffer A: Tris pH 7.5, NaCl, MgClβ‚‚, NP-40, Protease/Phosphatase Inhibitors
Supernatant Collected: Cytoplasmic Extract
3. Nuclear Extraction
Resuspend nuclear pellet in Buffer B
Incubate 4Β°C, 1400 rpm, 2 hours β†’ Spin 13,000 rpm / 5 min
Buffer B: HEPES pH 7.3, NaCl, EDTA, Glycerol
4. Final Nuclear Extract
Supernatant collected & stored at βˆ’80Β°C with 30% glycerol
Cytoplasm Nucleus
BCA Mechanism
Cu²⁺ + Protein Cu⁺
(Biuret Reaction)
Cu⁺ + 2 BCA
Purple Complex
Measured at 562 nm
BSA Standard Curve
y = 0.0159x + 0.1354
RΒ² = 0.9886
Chart
Sample Results & Protein Loading
Target Load: 50 Β΅g
Sample ID
Abs (562nm)
Conc. (Β΅g/Β΅L)
Vol for 50Β΅g
Ctrl - 1
0.542
2.56
19.5 Β΅L
Ctrl - 2
0.538
2.53
19.8 Β΅L
MZ1 (1Β΅M) - 1
0.312
1.11
45.0 Β΅L
MZ1 (1Β΅M) - 2
0.298
1.02
49.0 Β΅L
Key Finding: Treatment-dependent changes in nuclear protein content were observed. MZ1 alters cellular protein dynamics, resulting in significantly higher required loading volumes to achieve 50 Β΅g compared to untreated controls.
DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY | UNIVERSITY NAME
12
Made byBobr AI
Western Blotting Protocol
SDS-PAGE β†’ Transfer β†’ Antibody Detection
01
Sample Preparation & SDS-PAGE
Denaturation at 95Β°C with 4Γ— SDS loading dye + Ξ²-mercaptoethanol
12% resolving gel + 4% stacking gel
120V stacking β†’ 100V resolving
Tris-glycine-SDS running buffer
02
PVDF Membrane Transfer
Wet transfer system
PVDF activated in methanol 15-20s
Anode (+)
Filter paper
PVDF Membrane
Polyacrylamide Gel
Filter paper
Cathode (βˆ’)
Transfer buffer: Methanol 20% + 1x Running buffer
03
Blocking
5% BSA in TBST β€” 1 hour RT
Prevents non-specific antibody binding
04
Antibody Incubation
Primary Antibodies
Anti-p53 (mouse mono)
1:1000 | 4Β°C overnight
Anti-Ξ±-Tubulin (rabbit)
1:1000 | 4Β°C overnight
Secondary Antibodies
Goat anti-mouse IRDye 800
1:10,000
Goat anti-rabbit IRDye 680RD
1:10,000
05
Detection & Analysis
Li-Cor Odyssey Infrared Imaging System
Band densitometry: ImageJ software
Normalized to Ξ±-tubulin loading control
Target Proteins
p53
~53 kDa
Tumor suppressor
Ξ±-Tubulin
~50-55 kDa
Loading control
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS
RNA Extraction & RT-PCR Protocol
RNA Extraction Flowchart (QIAGEN RNeasy Plus)
1
Cell Lysis
RLT buffer added to pellet, repeated pipetting, centrifuge 10,000 rpm/3 min
2
QIAshredder Column
Mechanical homogenization, reduce viscosity, remove debris
3
gDNA Eliminator Column
Removes genomic DNA contamination
4
Add 70% Ethanol
Promotes RNA binding to silica membrane
5
RNeasy Spin Column
RNA binds selectively, contaminants pass through
6
DNase Treatment
DNase + RDD buffer, 15 min RT, complete DNA digestion
7
Wash Steps
RW1 buffer washes, remove proteins
8
Elute with RNase-free water
Purified RNA collected
PURITY CHECK
Control: 1472.439 ng/Β΅L A260/280 = 2.094 βœ“
MZ-1: 1272.322 ng/Β΅L A260/280 = 2.103 βœ“
Both samples: high purity, A260/280 β‰ˆ 2.0 = RNA quality confirmed
cDNA SYNTHESIS
65Β°C
10 min
Denature
4Β°C
Hold
55Β°C
60 min
Synthesis
85Β°C
5 min
Inactivate
4Β°C
Hold
Components:
1Β΅g RNA + primers + RT buffer + Scriptase + RNase inhibitor + dNTPs → 20Β΅L rxn
RT-PCR SETUP (SYBR Green)
Thermal Profile
95Β°C / 30s
Γ—40
95Β°C / 15s
60Β°C / 30s
Melt curve: 65Β°C - 95Β°C
Reagent Volume (Β΅L)
SYBR Master Mix 10.0
Forward Primer 1.0
Reverse Primer 1.0
cDNA Template 1.0
RNase-free Water 7.0
Total Volume 20.0
PRIMERS
TP53 Target Gene F/R
TBP Reference/Housekeeping F/R
Analysis Method
2βˆ’Ξ”Ξ”Ct
Relative Quantification
[University Name] β€’ [Institute Name] β€’ Department of Biochemistry
Made byBobr AI

rMATS Pipeline: Alternative Splicing Analysis

Offline Setup on WSL Ubuntu 20.04 | Differential Splicing Detection

rMATS (replicate Multivariate Analysis of Transcript Splicing)
Statistical framework for detecting differential alternative splicing from RNA-Seq data.
Compares splice junction reads between two conditions using replicate BAM files + GTF annotation.
1
Raw FASTQ Files
Quality control of raw sequence data
2
fastp QC & Trimming
Adapter removal & quality filtering
3
HISAT2 Alignment
Splice-aware alignment to human genome
4
SAMtools Processing
SAM β†’ BAM conversion, sort & index
5
rMATS Execution
treated_bams.txt + control_bams.txt + GTF
6
Output Files
5 distinct splicing event types
bash - pipeline_setup
$ system_info
OS: Ubuntu 20.04 (WSL)
$ conda activate rnaseq_env
$ conda list --grep pipeline_tools
> Miniconda3 (Python 3.8)
> HISAT2 v2.2.1 | SAMtools | fastp
> rMATS turbo v4.3.0
Output Statistical Parameters
Ξ”PSI
Exon inclusion level difference
P-val
Statistical significance
FDR
Corrected for multiple testing
SE Skipped Exon
RI Retained Intron
A5SS Alternative 5' Splice Site
A3SS Alternative 3' Splice Site
MXE Mutually Exclusive Exons
Pipeline Successfully Established Framework ready for splicing modulator analysis
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | Bioinformatics Core
Made byBobr AI
RESULTS β€” SECTION 4.1 & 4.2
MCF-7 Cell Morphology & Protein Quantification
MCF-7 cells at 70-80% confluency
50 Β΅m
Key Observations
Adherent epithelial morphology confirmed
Polygonal to irregular shape β€” epithelial origin
Cobblestone arrangement β€” intact cell-cell adhesion
Active proliferation clusters visible
Cells suitable for downstream experiments
BSA Standard Curve
Linear calibration for total protein quantification (Absorbance at 562 nm)
0 2 4 6 8 10 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 BSA Concentration (Β΅g/mL) Absorbance (OD₅₆₂)
y = 0.0159x + 0.1354
RΒ² = 0.9886
Highly Linear
Experimental Condition
Absorbance (OD₅₆₂)
Volume for 50Β΅g (Β΅L)
Control (Untreated)
1.5393
5.66
MZ-1 Treated
1.5894
5.47
Radiation 30min
1.4584
6.01
MZ-1 + Radiation 30min
1.3173
6.73
Radiation 2hr
1.5459
5.64
MZ-1 + Radiation 2hr
1.3750
6.41
Radiation 4hr
1.3141
6.74
MZ-1 + Radiation 4hr
1.4431
6.08
Key Interpretation
MZ1 + Radiation combinations show altered protein concentrations β€” treatment-dependent cellular responses confirmed
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
p53
BRD4
Western Blot Analysis: p53 Protein Expression
BRD4 Degradation (MZ1) Consistently Elevates p53 Levels
Representative Western Blot
Unirradiated
2Gy 30min
2Gy 2hr
2Gy 4hr
MZ1
βˆ’+
βˆ’+
βˆ’+
βˆ’+
p53 (~53 kDa)
α-Tubulin (~55 kDa)
Normalized p53 Intensity
Untreated (βˆ’)
MZ1-treated (+)
1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
1.01
1.44
Unirradiated
0.90
1.45
2Gy 30min
1.28
1.48
HIGHEST p53 RESPONSE
2Gy 2hr
0.94
1.15
2Gy 4hr
Key Observations
MZ1 alone p53 even without radiation (1.44× vs 1.01)
At 2hr post-radiation: MZ1 produces maximum p53 accumulation
MZ1 consistently sustains elevated p53 across all time points
BRD4 degradation post-translational p53 stabilization
Key Conclusion
BRD4 positively regulates p53 protein levels — MZ1 enhances radiation-induced p53 response in MCF-7 cells
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
RESULTS β€” 4.4 & 4.5
RT-PCR: TP53 Transcript Analysis & Agarose Gel
[University Logo]
[Institute Logo]
RNA Quality Summary
Control: 1472.44 ng/Β΅L | A260/280 = 2.094 βœ“
MZ-1: 1272.32 ng/Β΅L | A260/280 = 2.103 βœ“
Gene Control Cq MZ-1 Cq
p53 26.32 26.48
TBP 22.72 22.31
Control: Ξ”Cq = 3.60
MZ-1: Ξ”Cq = 4.17
ΔΔCq = 0.56
Fold Change = 0.68
Relative p53 Expression
1.5
1.0
0.5
Control
MZ-1
Amplification
Melt Curve
!
Fold change β‰ˆ 0.68 β€” NOT significantly different from 1.0 (unity).
MZ1 does NOT alter TP53 mRNA levels.
Agarose Gel Results
100bp
Ladder
Control
p53
p53
+ MZ-1
Control
TBP
TBP
+ MZ-1
No visible change in band intensity between control and MZ-1 samples β†’ corroborates RT-PCR finding
MZ1 does NOT affect TP53 at transcriptional level β†’ BRD4 regulates p53 POST-TRANSCRIPTIONALLY / POST-TRANSLATIONALLY (protein stability mechanism)
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
LOGO
LOGO
rMATS Pipeline: Alternative Splicing Output
Successfully Established Framework for Splicing Analysis
Pipeline Status
SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED
WSL Ubuntu 20.04 Miniconda3 Python 3.8 HISAT2 SAMtools fastp rMATS turbo v4.3.0
~/pipeline/rMATS_output
rMATS_output/
β”œβ”€β”€ 
SE.MATS.JC.txt (Skipped Exons)
β”œβ”€β”€ 
RI.MATS.JC.txt (Retained Introns)
β”œβ”€β”€ 
A5SS.MATS.JC.txt (Alt 5' Splice Sites)
β”œβ”€β”€ 
A3SS.MATS.JC.txt (Alt 3' Splice Sites)
└── 
MXE.MATS.JC.txt (Mutually Exclusive Exons)
Key Parameters Analyzed
Inclusion Level Ξ”PSI P-value FDR
SE Skipped Exon
Most Common
RI Retained Intron
A5SS Alternative 5' Splice
A3SS Alternative 3' Splice
MXE Mutually Exclusive Exons
Application Context
β–Έ
Pipeline designed for: Splicing changes upon treatment with splicing modulators (e.g., Pladienolide B, H3B-8800) in breast cancer cells.
β–Έ
Future use: Identify novel splice isoforms as biomarkers or drug targets.
β–Έ
Status: RNA-seq datasets ready for full biological analysis once replicates available.
Key Laboratory Milestone
"This establishes the first rMATS workflow in the laboratory β€” enabling future transcriptome-wide splicing studies in cancer."
Bioinformatics Pipeline | Splicing Analysis | Transcriptomics
Made byBobr AI
DISCUSSION
Interpretation of Findings
[University Logo]
[Institute Logo]
Key Finding 1: MZ1 Elevates p53 Protein
BRD4 degradation by MZ1 β†’ Consistent p53 protein upregulation across all conditions
Strongest effect at 2hr post-2Gy radiation
Mechanism proposed: BRD4 regulates MDM2-p53 axis OR directly stabilizes p53 protein post-translationally
Supporting literature: Nagarajan et al. (2022), Zhou et al. (2022)
Key Finding 2: No Transcriptional Change
TP53 mRNA levels unchanged by MZ1 (fold change = 0.68, near unity)
BRD4 does NOT regulate p53 at transcriptional level in these conditions
Mechanistic implication: BRD4 may regulate p53 protein STABILITY via MDM2 degradation pathway or direct protein interaction
Paradigm: Protein-level β‰  mRNA-level regulation
MCF-7 Model Significance
Wild-type p53 β€” clean model for epigenetic regulation study
Luminal A β†’ 40% of all breast cancers β†’ high clinical relevance
Intact MDM2-p53 feedback loop allows clean interpretation
Results free from gain-of-function mutant p53 confound (unlike MDA-MB-231)
rMATS Pipeline Achievement
First rMATS workflow established in laboratory
Successfully processes RNA-Seq β†’ BAM β†’ Differential splicing events
Framework ready for: splicing modulator experiments, spliceome characterization
Foundation for future transcriptome-wide studies
Integrative Model: BRD4-p53 Regulation & Radiation Response
BRD4 Active
p53 Protein Regulated at Post-translational Level
Normal p53 Function
MZ1 Treatment
BRD4 Degraded
Altered p53 Protein Stability
Enhanced p53 Accumulation
Radiation
p53 Stabilized via ATM
Combined Effect Amplified with MZ1
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
[University Logo]
[Institute Logo]
Conclusions
BRD4 as a Post-Translational Regulator of p53 in Breast Cancer
01
METHODOLOGY
Experimental model successfully established
MCF-7 cells cultured, nuclear protein isolation, BCA quantification, Western blotting, RNA extraction, RT-PCR all performed effectively β€” reliable data generated
04
BIOINFORMATICS
rMATS Pipeline Successfully Established
First rMATS framework in the laboratory β€” bioinformatics infrastructure for future splicing studies validated
02
CORE FINDING
BRD4 Degradation Increases p53 Protein
β€’
MZ1 treatment leads to increased p53 protein intensity in MCF-7 nuclear extracts β†’ BRD4 plays a positive regulatory role in p53 protein expression
β€’
Enhanced effect observed under 2Gy radiation β€” peak at 2hr post-irradiation
03
MECHANISM
BRD4 Does NOT Affect TP53 Transcription
βœ“
qPCR fold change β‰ˆ 0.68 (near unity) β†’ MZ1 does not alter TP53 mRNA levels
βœ“
BRD4 regulates p53 POST-TRANSCRIPTIONALLY or POST-TRANSLATIONALLY
05
SIGNIFICANCE
Therapeutic Implication
β€’
BRD4 may be a therapeutic target for enhancing radiosensitivity β€” particularly in tumors with aberrant p53 expression
β€’
Rationale for BRD4-targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy to overcome resistance
"These findings highlight a previously underappreciated role of BRD4 in post-translational p53 regulation in hormone-responsive breast cancer"
PhD Defense | Conclusion | BRD4 and p53 Regulation
Made byBobr AI
FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future Work & Research Scope

Mechanistic Validation

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) to confirm BRD4-MDM2 interaction
  • Ubiquitination assays β€” confirm BRD4 role in p53 proteasomal regulation
  • CHX chase experiment β€” p53 protein stability assay

Functional Assays

  • Apoptosis detection (Annexin V/PI)
  • Clonogenic survival assay post-MZ1+radiation
  • Cell cycle analysis (flow cytometry)
  • Validate protein changes β†’ biological outcomes

ChIP-seq Analysis

  • ChIP-seq for BRD4 and H3K27ac at TP53 locus
  • Confirm BRD4 super-enhancer occupancy at TP53
  • Map epigenetic changes post-MZ1 treatment

Extension to TNBC

  • Study BRD4-p53 axis in MDA-MB-231 (mutant p53 R280K)
  • Compare regulation between wt-p53 (MCF-7) vs mutp53 (MDA-MB-231)
  • Determine subtype-specificity of BRD4-p53 regulation

In Vivo & Clinical Translation

  • MZ1 + tamoxifen combination in MCF-7 xenograft models
  • MZ1 + ionizing radiation in vivo β€” test radiosensitization
  • Clinical relevance: BRD4 as predictive biomarker for radiation response
"Establishing BRD4 as a radiosensitization target could revolutionize treatment of ER+ breast cancer patients resistant to endocrine therapy"
[ UNIVERSITY LOGO ]
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Slide 24
Made byBobr AI
REFERENCES
References
Key Citations Supporting This Research
37 references
1.
Ali et al. (2021) β€” Co-targeting BRD4 and RAC1. Int J Biol Sci, 17(14), 3760–3779.
2.
Dillon et al. (2023) β€” BRD4 inhibition in ER+ breast cancer. Cancers, 15(16), 4066.
3.
Frezzo et al. (2023) β€” BRD4-p53 signalling axis. Int J Mol Sci, 24(7), 6201.
4.
Gadd et al. (2017) β€” PROTAC structural basis. Nature Chem Biol, 13(5), 514–521.
5.
Kotekar & Bhatt (2023) β€” BRD4 and MYC. FEBS J, 290(20), 4820–4842.
6.
Liu et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 post-translational modifications. Front Oncol, 12, 847701.
7.
Ma et al. (2022) β€” MZ1 in AML. Cancer Biol Ther, 23(1), 1–15.
8.
Nagarajan et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 and wt-p53 in luminal cancer. Nucleic Acids Res, 50(11).
9.
Naeimzadeh et al. (2024) β€” Mutant p53 in TNBC. Cell Commun Signal, 22, 484.
10.
Qian et al. (2023) β€” Super-enhancers and BRD4. Cell Death Discov, 9(1), 470.
11.
Wan et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 super-enhancer in breast cancer. PNAS, 119(6).
12.
Wang et al. (2023) β€” BET proteins: biology and therapy. Signal Transduct, 8, 420.
13.
Yousuf & Khan (2025) β€” MDM2-p53 in breast cancer. Oncology Res, 33(4).
14.
Zengerle et al. (2015) β€” MZ1 selective BRD4 degradation. ACS Chem Biol, 10(8).
15.
Zhou et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 and mutant p53 in TNBC. Int J Mol Sci, 23(23).
16.
Arnold et al. (2022) β€” Global breast cancer burden. The Breast, 66, 15–23.
17.
Essmann et al. (2004) β€” MCF-7 radiation apoptosis resistance. Cancer Res, 64(19).
18.
Floyd et al. (2013) β€” BRD4 insulates chromatin from DDR. Nature, 498(7453).
GLOBOCAN 2022 | WHO 2019 | WCRF 2025
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
[Univ
Logo]
[Inst
Logo]
Thank You
Questions & Discussion
Research Summary
πŸ”¬
BRD4 positively regulates p53 protein in MCF-7 cells
🧬
Regulation is post-translational, not transcriptional
βš—οΈ
rMATS pipeline successfully established
[Student Name]
[student.email@university.edu]
[Department of Biochemistry / Biotechnology]
[Institute Name | University Name]
Guided by: [Dr. Guide Name]
[Department | Institute | Year]
[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]
Made byBobr AI
Bobr AI

DESIGNER-MADE
PRESENTATION,
GENERATED FROM
YOUR PROMPT

Create your own professional slide deck with real images, data charts, and unique design in under a minute.

Generate For Free

BRD4 Regulation of p53 in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Study

PhD thesis analysis on BRD4-mediated post-translational regulation of p53 in breast cancer cells and rMATS pipeline for alternative splicing analysis.

[University Logo]

[Institute Logo]

PhD THESIS DEFENSE 2024

Role of BRD4 in Regulation of p53 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells (MCF-7)

Establishing rMATS Pipeline for Alternative Splicing Analysis

CANDIDATE

[Student Name]

[Enrollment No.]

GUIDED BY

[Dr. Guide Name]

[Department of Biochemistry / Biotechnology]

[Institute Name]

[University Name]

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

p53

BRD4

Presentation Overview

Thesis Defense | BRD4 & p53 in Breast Cancer

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

01

πŸ”¬

Introduction

Breast Cancer Overview, Epidemiology

02

🧬

Molecular Biology

BRD4, p53, BET Family

03

πŸ”

Epigenetics

Histone Modifications, Super-Enhancers

04

πŸ’Š

MZ1 PROTAC

Mechanism & Selectivity

05

πŸ₯

MCF-7 Model

Cell Line & DNA Damage

06

βš—οΈ

Methodology

Western Blot, RT-PCR, rMATS

07

πŸ“Š

Results

BCA, Western Blot, qPCR Data

08

πŸ’¬

Discussion

Findings & Significance

09

🎯

Conclusion

Future Scope & References

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

2.3 Million

New cases annually (GLOBOCAN 2021)

685,000

Deaths per year worldwide

Most common

Cancer in women globally

TP53 Mutation

50% of all cancers

BRD4 Upregulation

Epigenetic driver

TNBC Subtype

Most aggressive, no receptor targets

Cell Cycle Dysregulation

CDK pathway disruption

The interplay between BRD4 and p53 represents a critical therapeutic axis in breast cancer progression.

[University Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID]

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Global & Indian Burden of Breast Cancer

2.3M

685K

192,020

98,337

Source: GLOBOCAN 2022

Luminal A

Luminal B

HER2-enriched

TNBC / Basal-like

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Department]

Molecular Classification

Four Subtypes β€” Distinct Biology, Distinct Outcomes

LUMINAL A

~40%

Low Ki-67

TP53 Mut: <15%

Endocrine therapy responsive

BEST PROGNOSIS

LUMINAL B

~20%

TP53 Mut: 25%

Endocrine + Chemo

MODERATE PROGNOSIS

HER2-ENRICHED

~15%

TP53 Mut: 40%

Trastuzumab

MODERATE PROGNOSIS

TNBC / BASAL-LIKE

~15-20%

TP53 Mut: >82%

Chemo only (PARP/PD1)

POOR PROGNOSIS

Department of Oncology | Graduate Research Defense

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

BRD4 & the BET Protein Family

BRD2

BRD3

BRD4

OVEREXPRESSED IN CANCER

BRDT

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

12

BRD4 Dual Function Pathway

Transcription regulation and oncogene activation mechanics

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR

p53: The Guardian of the Genome

TP53 β€” Most Frequently Mutated Gene in Human Cancer

TP53 mutated in ~50% of all cancers

>80% of TNBC | <15% of Luminal A

University Name | Institute Name | Department of Molecular Biology

MOLECULAR AXIS

BRD4–p53 Regulatory Interaction

How BRD4 Controls the Tumor Suppressor

[Institute Logo]

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

BRD4 occupancy required for baseline TP53 transcription (Zhou et al., 2022)

BRD4 Active

BRD4 reads H3K27ac at TP53 super-enhancer

Recruits transcriptional machinery

p53 mRNA transcribed

p53 protein expressed

Tumor suppression active

BRD4 Inhibited (JQ1)

BRD4 displaced from super-enhancer

Partial reduction in TP53 transcription

Some p53 protein reduction

BRD4 Degraded (MZ1)

Complete BRD4 elimination

Super-enhancer collapse

Post-translational p53 accumulation

Complex regulatory outcome

Nagarajan et al. (2022)

BRD4 regulates wild-type p53 at super-enhancers in luminal breast cancer

Zhou et al. (2022)

BRD4 required for baseline TP53 transcription in MCF-7 cells

DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE

Radiation & DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

2 Gy Ionizing Radiation

DNA Double-Strand Break (DSB)

MRN Complex (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) detects DSB

ATM Kinase Recruited & Activated

DNA Repair Pathway

Ξ³H2AX foci formation at DSBs

Homologous Recombination (HR) via RAD51

BRD4 phosphorylated at Ser1117 by IKKΞ± β†’ coordinates DDR

p53 Pathway

p53 phosphorylated at Ser15/Ser20

MDM2 interaction disrupted

p53 stabilized & accumulated

p21/CDK arrest β†’ G1/S checkpoint

BAX/PUMA β†’ Apoptosis

MCF-7 Response: G2/M arrest (not apoptosis) β€” Radioresistant apoptotic phenotype

BRD4 degradation by MZ1 β†’ ↓DNMT1 + ↓RAD51 β†’ Radiosensitization (Foran et al., 2025)

BRD4 needed for baseline p53 levels β†’ determines radiation response

Molecular Pathways in Radiation Pathology | Breast Cancer Research

EPIGENETICS

Histone Modification: Writers, Erasers & Readers

The Epigenetic Code in Breast Cancer

Ac marks (acetylation)

Me marks (methylation)

Ph marks (phosphorylation)

Ub marks (ubiquitination)

WRITERS

Deposit activating/repressive marks

HATs

CBP/p300, GCN5, PCAF

HMTs

EZH2, MLL, G9a

H3K27ac β˜…, H3K4me3

ERASERS

Remove histone marks

HDACs

HDAC1/2, SIRT1

HDMs

LSD1/KDM1A

HDAC1 reduced by BRD4-RAC1 inhibition

READERS

Recognize & bind marked histones

BRD4 (BET proteins)

Reads H3K27ac marks

Chromodomains

Read methylation

PHD fingers

Read methylation marks

β˜… BRD4 is the key oncogenic reader &rarr; THERAPEUTIC TARGET

H3K27ac

BRD4 docking, active super-enhancers

H3K27me3

Repressive, antagonizes BRD4

H3K9ac

Active transcription

H3K9me2/3

DSB repair sites

H4K16ac

Reduced at radiation DSBs

University Name | Epigenetics & Breast Cancer Research | 2024

Super-Enhancers & BRD4 Overexpression in Breast Cancer

TCGA Analysis: BRD4 as an Epigenetic Oncogene

BRD4 mRNA Expression Across Breast Cancer Subtypes (TCGA)

Normal Mammary

1.0Γ—

Luminal A

1.8Γ—

Luminal B

2.4Γ—

HER2+

3.1Γ—

TNBC / Basal-like

4.6Γ—

4.6Γ— overexpression uniquely in TNBC

High BRD4 = High tumor grade + Lymph node infiltration + Reduced survival

Potential prognostic biomarker for optimal risk stratification

Compact Chromatin (Repressed)

Open Chromatin with Super-Enhancer

MYC

BCL2

CCND1

TP53

BET Inhibitors (JQ1, MZ1) β†’ BRD4 removed from super-enhancer β†’ Preferential repression of oncogenes

BRD4 upregulation drives endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ breast cancer via super-enhancer reprogramming of ESR1

UNIV LOGO

INST LOGO

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | Data source: TCGA Breast Cancer (BRCA) Project

[University Logo]

[Institute Logo]

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL

MCF-7: The Luminal A Breast Cancer Model

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

[UNIV]

[DEPT]

THERAPEUTIC TOOL

MZ1 β€” A PROTAC Degrader of BRD4

Induced Proximity β†’ Ubiquitination β†’ Proteasomal Degradation

[University Name] | [Department] | 2024

BRD4's post-translational regulation of p53 in ER+ breast cancer is poorly understood

No study examined BRD4 degradation (vs inhibition) effect on p53 in radiation context

rMATS alternative splicing analysis pipeline not established in lab for splicing modulator studies

To investigate the role of BRD4 in regulation of p53 expression in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and to establish rMATS pipeline in lab to study splicing changes upon treatment with splicing modulators.

Evaluate effect of BRD4 degradation (MZ1) and ionizing radiation (2 Gy) on p53 PROTEIN expression in MCF-7 using Western blotting

Study effect of BRD4 degradation on p53 TRANSCRIPT expression using RT-PCR

Establish a functional rMATS pipeline for alternative splicing analysis

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Department]

Experimental Design

MCF-7 Cells | MZ1 PROTAC | Ionizing Radiation

MCF-7 (ER+, Wild-type p53) &nbsp;|&nbsp; DMEM + 10% FBS + 1% Pen/Strep &nbsp;|&nbsp; 37Β°C, 5% CO2 &nbsp;|&nbsp; 70-80% confluency

MZ1 Treatment

100 nM MZ1 (PROTAC BRD4 degrader)

Pre-treatment before radiation

Selective BRD4 degradation

8 Experimental Groups

Control

βˆ’MZ1 / βˆ’IR

MZ1 Only

+MZ1 / βˆ’IR

2Gy 30min

βˆ’MZ1 / +IR

MZ1+2Gy 30min

+MZ1 / +IR

2Gy 2hr

βˆ’MZ1 / +IR

MZ1+2Gy 2hr

+MZ1 / +IR

2Gy 4hr

βˆ’MZ1 / +IR

MZ1+2Gy 4hr

+MZ1 / +IR

Ionizing Radiation

2 Gy dose

Harvested at 3 time points: 30 min, 2 hr, 4 hr

Protein Analysis

Nuclear Protein Extraction

BCA Assay

Western Blot (p53 + Ξ±-tubulin)

Transcript Analysis

RNA Extraction

cDNA Synthesis

RT-PCR (p53/TBP)

Bioinformatics

rMATS Pipeline Setup

[University Logo]

[Institute Logo]

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

METHODOLOGY

Nuclear Protein Extraction & BCA Protein Assay

DEPARTMENT OF BIOCHEMISTRY | UNIVERSITY NAME

12

Western Blotting Protocol

SDS-PAGE β†’ Transfer β†’ Antibody Detection

Sample Preparation & SDS-PAGE

Denaturation at 95Β°C with 4Γ— SDS loading dye + Ξ²-mercaptoethanol

12% resolving gel + 4% stacking gel

120V stacking β†’ 100V resolving

Tris-glycine-SDS running buffer

PVDF Membrane Transfer

Wet transfer system

PVDF activated in methanol 15-20s

Transfer buffer: Methanol 20% + 1x Running buffer

Blocking

5% BSA in TBST β€” 1 hour RT

Prevents non-specific antibody binding

Antibody Incubation

Detection & Analysis

Li-Cor Odyssey Infrared Imaging System

Band densitometry: ImageJ software

Normalized to Ξ±-tubulin loading control

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Department]

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS

RNA Extraction & RT-PCR Protocol

RNA Extraction Flowchart (QIAGEN RNeasy Plus)

Cell Lysis

RLT buffer added to pellet, repeated pipetting, centrifuge 10,000 rpm/3 min

QIAshredder Column

Mechanical homogenization, reduce viscosity, remove debris

gDNA Eliminator Column

Removes genomic DNA contamination

Add 70% Ethanol

Promotes RNA binding to silica membrane

RNeasy Spin Column

RNA binds selectively, contaminants pass through

DNase Treatment

DNase + RDD buffer, 15 min RT, complete DNA digestion

Wash Steps

RW1 buffer washes, remove proteins

Elute with RNase-free water

Purified RNA collected

PURITY CHECK

Both samples: high purity, A260/280 β‰ˆ 2.0 = RNA quality confirmed

cDNA SYNTHESIS

RT-PCR SETUP (SYBR Green)

PRIMERS

Analysis Method

[University Name] β€’ [Institute Name] β€’ Department of Biochemistry

rMATS Pipeline: Alternative Splicing Analysis

Offline Setup on WSL Ubuntu 20.04 | Differential Splicing Detection

Statistical framework for detecting differential alternative splicing from RNA-Seq data.

Compares splice junction reads between two conditions using replicate BAM files + GTF annotation.

Quality control of raw sequence data

Adapter removal & quality filtering

Splice-aware alignment to human genome

SAM β†’ BAM conversion, sort & index

treated_bams.txt + control_bams.txt + GTF

5 distinct splicing event types

Ubuntu 20.04 (WSL)

Exon inclusion level difference

Statistical significance

Corrected for multiple testing

Pipeline Successfully Established

Framework ready for splicing modulator analysis

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | Bioinformatics Core

RESULTS β€” SECTION 4.1 & 4.2

MCF-7 Cell Morphology & Protein Quantification

Adherent epithelial morphology confirmed

Polygonal to irregular shape β€” epithelial origin

Cobblestone arrangement β€” intact cell-cell adhesion

Active proliferation clusters visible

Cells suitable for downstream experiments

MZ1 + Radiation combinations show altered protein concentrations β€” treatment-dependent cellular responses confirmed

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

Western Blot Analysis: p53 Protein Expression

BRD4 Degradation (MZ1) Consistently Elevates p53 Levels

p53

BRD4

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

RESULTS β€” 4.4 & 4.5

RT-PCR: TP53 Transcript Analysis & Agarose Gel

[University Logo]

[Institute Logo]

RNA Quality Summary

1472.44 ng/Β΅L | A260/280 = 2.094

1272.32 ng/Β΅L | A260/280 = 2.103

p53

TBP

26.32

26.48

22.72

22.31

Ξ”Cq = 3.60

Ξ”Cq = 4.17

ΔΔCq = 0.56

Fold Change = 0.68

Fold change β‰ˆ 0.68 β€” NOT significantly different from 1.0 (unity).

MZ1 does NOT alter TP53 mRNA levels.

No visible change in band intensity between control and MZ-1 samples β†’ corroborates RT-PCR finding

MZ1 does NOT affect TP53 at transcriptional level β†’ BRD4 regulates p53 POST-TRANSCRIPTIONALLY / POST-TRANSLATIONALLY (protein stability mechanism)

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

rMATS Pipeline: Alternative Splicing Output

Successfully Established Framework for Splicing Analysis

LOGO

LOGO

Bioinformatics Pipeline | Splicing Analysis | Transcriptomics

Application Context

Key Laboratory Milestone

This establishes the first rMATS workflow in the laboratory β€” enabling future transcriptome-wide splicing studies in cancer.

DISCUSSION

Interpretation of Findings

[University Logo]

[Institute Logo]

Key Finding 1: MZ1 Elevates p53 Protein

BRD4 degradation by MZ1 β†’ Consistent p53 protein upregulation across all conditions

Strongest effect at 2hr post-2Gy radiation

Mechanism proposed: BRD4 regulates MDM2-p53 axis OR directly stabilizes p53 protein post-translationally

Supporting literature: Nagarajan et al. (2022), Zhou et al. (2022)

Key Finding 2: No Transcriptional Change

TP53 mRNA levels unchanged by MZ1 (fold change = 0.68, near unity)

BRD4 does NOT regulate p53 at transcriptional level in these conditions

Mechanistic implication: BRD4 may regulate p53 protein STABILITY via MDM2 degradation pathway or direct protein interaction

Paradigm: Protein-level β‰  mRNA-level regulation

MCF-7 Model Significance

Wild-type p53 β€” clean model for epigenetic regulation study

Luminal A β†’ 40% of all breast cancers β†’ high clinical relevance

Intact MDM2-p53 feedback loop allows clean interpretation

Results free from gain-of-function mutant p53 confound (unlike MDA-MB-231)

rMATS Pipeline Achievement

First rMATS workflow established in laboratory

Successfully processes RNA-Seq β†’ BAM β†’ Differential splicing events

Framework ready for: splicing modulator experiments, spliceome characterization

Foundation for future transcriptome-wide studies

Integrative Model: BRD4-p53 Regulation & Radiation Response

BRD4 Active

p53 Protein Regulated at Post-translational Level

Normal p53 Function

MZ1 Treatment

BRD4 Degraded

Altered p53 Protein Stability

Enhanced p53 Accumulation

Radiation

p53 Stabilized via ATM

Combined Effect Amplified with MZ1

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

BRD4 as a Post-Translational Regulator of p53 in Breast Cancer

Experimental model successfully established

MCF-7 cells cultured, nuclear protein isolation, BCA quantification, Western blotting, RNA extraction, RT-PCR all performed effectively β€” reliable data generated

BRD4 Degradation Increases p53 Protein

MZ1 treatment leads to increased p53 protein intensity in MCF-7 nuclear extracts β†’ BRD4 plays a positive regulatory role in p53 protein expression

Enhanced effect observed under 2Gy radiation β€” peak at 2hr post-irradiation

BRD4 Does NOT Affect TP53 Transcription

qPCR fold change β‰ˆ 0.68 (near unity) β†’ MZ1 does not alter TP53 mRNA levels

BRD4 regulates p53 POST-TRANSCRIPTIONALLY or POST-TRANSLATIONALLY

rMATS Pipeline Successfully Established

First rMATS framework in the laboratory β€” bioinformatics infrastructure for future splicing studies validated

Therapeutic Implication

BRD4 may be a therapeutic target for enhancing radiosensitivity β€” particularly in tumors with aberrant p53 expression

Rationale for BRD4-targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy to overcome resistance

These findings highlight a previously underappreciated role of BRD4 in post-translational p53 regulation in hormone-responsive breast cancer

[University Logo]

[Institute Logo]

PhD Defense | Conclusion | BRD4 and p53 Regulation

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future Work & Research Scope

Mechanistic Validation

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) to confirm BRD4-MDM2 interaction

Ubiquitination assays β€” confirm BRD4 role in p53 proteasomal regulation

CHX chase experiment β€” p53 protein stability assay

Functional Assays

Apoptosis detection (Annexin V/PI)

Clonogenic survival assay post-MZ1+radiation

Cell cycle analysis (flow cytometry)

Validate protein changes β†’ biological outcomes

ChIP-seq Analysis

ChIP-seq for BRD4 and H3K27ac at TP53 locus

Confirm BRD4 super-enhancer occupancy at TP53

Map epigenetic changes post-MZ1 treatment

Extension to TNBC

Study BRD4-p53 axis in MDA-MB-231 (mutant p53 R280K)

Compare regulation between wt-p53 (MCF-7) vs mutp53 (MDA-MB-231)

Determine subtype-specificity of BRD4-p53 regulation

In Vivo & Clinical Translation

MZ1 + tamoxifen combination in MCF-7 xenograft models

MZ1 + ionizing radiation in vivo β€” test radiosensitization

Clinical relevance: BRD4 as predictive biomarker for radiation response

Establishing BRD4 as a radiosensitization target could revolutionize treatment of ER+ breast cancer patients resistant to endocrine therapy

[ UNIVERSITY LOGO ]

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

Slide 24

References

Key Citations Supporting This Research

37 references

GLOBOCAN 2022 | WHO 2019 | WCRF 2025

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Student Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]

1.

Ali et al. (2021) β€” Co-targeting BRD4 and RAC1.

Int J Biol Sci, 17(14), 3760–3779.

2.

Dillon et al. (2023) β€” BRD4 inhibition in ER+ breast cancer.

Cancers, 15(16), 4066.

3.

Frezzo et al. (2023) β€” BRD4-p53 signalling axis.

Int J Mol Sci, 24(7), 6201.

4.

Gadd et al. (2017) β€” PROTAC structural basis.

Nature Chem Biol, 13(5), 514–521.

5.

Kotekar & Bhatt (2023) β€” BRD4 and MYC.

FEBS J, 290(20), 4820–4842.

6.

Liu et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 post-translational modifications.

Front Oncol, 12, 847701.

7.

Ma et al. (2022) β€” MZ1 in AML.

Cancer Biol Ther, 23(1), 1–15.

8.

Nagarajan et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 and wt-p53 in luminal cancer.

Nucleic Acids Res, 50(11).

9.

Naeimzadeh et al. (2024) β€” Mutant p53 in TNBC.

Cell Commun Signal, 22, 484.

10.

Qian et al. (2023) β€” Super-enhancers and BRD4.

Cell Death Discov, 9(1), 470.

11.

Wan et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 super-enhancer in breast cancer.

PNAS, 119(6).

12.

Wang et al. (2023) β€” BET proteins: biology and therapy.

Signal Transduct, 8, 420.

13.

Yousuf & Khan (2025) β€” MDM2-p53 in breast cancer.

Oncology Res, 33(4).

14.

Zengerle et al. (2015) β€” MZ1 selective BRD4 degradation.

ACS Chem Biol, 10(8).

15.

Zhou et al. (2022) β€” BRD4 and mutant p53 in TNBC.

Int J Mol Sci, 23(23).

16.

Arnold et al. (2022) β€” Global breast cancer burden.

The Breast, 66, 15–23.

17.

Essmann et al. (2004) β€” MCF-7 radiation apoptosis resistance.

Cancer Res, 64(19).

18.

Floyd et al. (2013) β€” BRD4 insulates chromatin from DDR.

Nature, 498(7453).

[Univ<br>Logo]

[Inst<br>Logo]

Thank You

Questions & Discussion

Research Summary

πŸ”¬

BRD4 positively regulates p53 protein in MCF-7 cells

🧬

Regulation is post-translational, not transcriptional

βš—οΈ

rMATS pipeline successfully established

[Student Name]

[student.email@university.edu]

[Department of Biochemistry / Biotechnology]

[Institute Name | University Name]

[Dr. Guide Name]

[Department | Institute | Year]

[University Name] | [Institute Name] | [Enrollment ID] | [Department]