Medical Ethics: The Case of Ana Estrada and Euthanasia in Peru

Medical Ethics Case Report

The Case of Ana Estrada

Right to a Dignified Death in Peru

Group Members: Younis, Rahim, Afnan

Ahmed Makaleh, Ahmed Massoud, Mohammed Khalil

Chief Complaint & Background

47-year-old psychologist from Lima, Peru

Diagnosed with polymyositis, an incurable muscle disease

Progressive muscle weakness over time

Lost ability to walk, move freely, or self-care

Dependent on medical equipment to breathe

History of Presenting Illness

Diagnosed in her twenties with polymyositis

Condition worsened gradually over 30 years

Increasing loss of independence and daily function

Continued working as a psychologist as long as possible

In 2016, sought legal control over end-of-life decisions

Medical & Ethical Concerns

No cure or treatment available to stop disease progression

Medical care could only prolong life, not improve it

Independence and quality of life could not be restored

Ongoing physical and emotional suffering

Ethical concern about dignity versus prolonged treatment

Legal & Ethical Dilemma

Assisted death was illegal under Peruvian law

Conflict between existing law and patient autonomy

Ana argued for control over her own body and decisions

Court faced balancing law versus fundamental human rights

Case raised a national ethical debate across Peru

Resolution & Conclusion

2022 Supreme Court granted legal exemption for Ana

Doctors allowed to assist under strict medical supervision

Medical and legal guidelines were followed carefully

Case concluded in April 2024

Landmark case for dignity and patient rights in Peru

Thank You

<br/>

<br/>

<br/>