# SIRP Usage Analysis & Security Workflow Optimization
> Comprehensive review of SIRP adoption, metrics, and security workflow maturity. Includes integration status for QRadar, CTM360, and Microsoft Defender.

Tags: cybersecurity, security-operations, sirp, incident-response, qradar, automation-metrics, threat-intelligence
## Slide 1: SIRP Usage Analysis
- Focus: Security Incident Response Platform Adoption and Optimization Review.
- Period: Management Review Q1 2026.

## Slide 2: SIRP Utilization by Function
- **Blocking IOCs**: 95% utilization (FMC, WSA, Defender, EOP).
- **CTM360 Incidents**: 90% utilization (ingestion, comment, takedown, closure).
- **QRadar Alerts**: 40% utilization (40% auto / 60% manual).
- **Threat Intelligence**: 40% (malware advisories auto).
- **Microsoft Defender**: 20% (ingestion and status limited).
- **Phishing Pipeline**: 0-10% utilization.

## Slide 3: Pending Tasks & Open Issues
- **Technical Issues**: Special character bugs in tickets and AnyRun file testing; artifact ingestion gaps in email bodies.
- **Integrations**: CISCO Duo and NDR integration pending; WSA URL pattern finalization.
- **Unsupported Features**: SARA AI, MTTA/MTTR dashboards, and SLA Case Management are not currently supported by the platform version.

## Slide 4: Adoption Patterns & Key Observations
- **High Performing**: IOC blocking (95%) and CTM360 lifecycle management (90%+).
- **Partially Adopted**: QRadar automation and Malware Logs.
- **Low Adoption**: Phishing and Quarantine email workflows are not yet operational.

## Slide 5: Recommended Actions & Roadmap
- **Phase 1 (0-2 months)**: Finalize phishing playbooks and fix technical ingestion bugs.
- **Phase 2 (2-6 months)**: Increase QRadar automation to 70%+; complete Duo and NDR integrations.
- **Phase 3 (6-12 months)**: Target 70%+ overall utilization and engage vendor for dashboard and AI roadmap items.
---
This presentation was created with [Bobr AI](https://bobr.ai) — an AI presentation generator.